---
title: 'Volume 66'
date: '2015-01-07T01:09:14-06:00'
type: page
word_count: 586
char_count: 4688
tokens: 762
---

# Volume 66

Issue 1
-------

Thomas W. Mitchell, [*Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Mitchell.pdf), 66 Ala. L. Rev. 1 (2014).

Elizabeth A. Rowe & Daniel M. Mahfood, *[Trade Secrets, Trade, and Extraterritoriality](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Rowe.pdf)*, 66 Ala. L. Rev. 63 (2014).

Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., [*The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and the Challenge of Resisting – or Engaging – Transnational Constitutional Law*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Kroto.pdf), 66 Ala. L. Rev. 105 (2014).

David S. Law, [*Constitutional Convergence and Comparative Competency: a Reply to Professors Jackson and Krotoszynski*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Jackson.pdf), 66 Ala. L. Rev. 145 (2014).

Vicki C. Jackson, [*Comparative Constitutionalism, Legal Education, and Civic Attitudes: Reflections in Response to Professors Krotoszynski and Law*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Jackson.pdf), 66 Ala. L. Rev. 155 (2014).

Jules L. Coleman, [*Markets, Methods, Morals and the Law*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Coleman%20.pdf), 66 Ala. L. Rev. 169 (2014).

Joseph Wehr, Note, [*The Canary in the Coal Mine: The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin Dispute and the Need for Comprehensive Interstate Water Allocation Reform*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2066/Issue%201/Wehr%20.pdf), 66 Ala. L. Rev. 203 (2014).

Issue 2
-------

Heather Elliott, [The Structure of Standing *at 25: Introduction to the Symposium*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/1%20Elliott%20Intro%20269-275.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 269 (2013).

William A. Fletcher, [*Standing: Who Can Sue to Enforce a Legal Duty*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/2%20Fletcher%20277-287.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 277 (2013).

Robert J. Pushaw, Jr., [*Fortuity and the Article III “Case”: A Critique of Fletcher’s* The Structure of Standing](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/3%20Pushaw%20289-348.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 289 (2013).

Maxwell L. Stearns, [*Grains of Sand or Butterfly Effect: Standing, the Legitimacy of Precedent, and Reflections on* Hollingsworth *and* Windsor](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/4%20Stearns%20349-401.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 349 (2013).

Jonathan R. Siegel, [*What if the Universal Injury-in-Fact Test Already Is Normative?*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/5%20Seigel%20403-415.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 403 (2013).

F. Andrew Hessick, [*Standing in Diversity*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/6%20Hessick%20417-433.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 417 (2013).

Heather Elliott, [*Federalism Standing*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/7%20Elliott%20435-456.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 435 (2013).

Thomas D. Rowe, Jr., [*Exhuming the “Diversity Explanation” of the Eleventh Amendment*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/8%20Rowe%20457-472.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 457 (2013).

Ernest A. Young, [*In Praise of Judge Fletcher-And of General Standing Principles*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/9%20Young%20473-499.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 473 (2013).

Larry Alexander, [*The Objectivity of Morality, Rules, and Law: A Conceptual Map*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/10%20Alexander%20501-517.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 501 (2013).

Zachary L. Guyse, Note, [*Alabama’s Original Sin: Property Taxes, Racism, and Constitutional Reform in Alabama*](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/11%20Guyse%20519-538.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 519 (2013).

Rhojonda A. Debrow Cornett, Note, [*Seeing Red: A Critical Analysis of* Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc.](http://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2065/Issue%202/12%20Debrow%20Cornett%20539-565.pdf), 65 Ala. L. Rev. 539 (2013).