--- title: 'Volume 61' date: '2011-08-30T20:50:48-05:00' type: page word_count: 1107 char_count: 8355 tokens: 1440 --- # Volume 61 Issue 1 ------- Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, *[Litigating Groups](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%201/burch.pdf)* Ronald J. Colombo, *[Cooperation with Securities Fraud](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%201/colombo.pdf)* Bret D. Asbury, *[Law as Palimpsest: Conceptualizing Contingency in Judicial Opinions](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%201/asbury.pdf)* Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., *[A Man for All Seasons: Judge Frank M. Johnson Jr. and the Quest to Secure the Rule of Law](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%201/kroto.pdf)* Erik Harris, Note, *[Discovery of Portable Electronic Devices](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%201/harris.pdf)* Issue 2 ------- William A. Drennan, *[Surnamed Charitable Trusts: Immortality at Taxpayer Expense](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%202/drennan.pdf)* Lee-ford Tritt, *[Technical Correction or Tectonic Shift: Competing Default Rule Theories Under the New Uniform Probate Code](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%202/tritt.pdf)* Frederick Mark Gedicks, *[Truth and Consequences: Mitt Romney, Proposition 8, and Public Reason](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%202/gedicks.pdf)* Jennifer A. Hanson, Note, *[The Academic Medical Center Exception to the Stark Law: Compliance by Teaching Hospitals](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%202/hanson.pdf)* Breanna R. Harris, Note, *[Veiled in Textual Neutrality: Is That Enough? A Candid Reexamination of the Constitutionality of Section 4454 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%202/harris.pdf)* James W. Wright, Jr., Note, *[Making State Religious Freedom Restoration Amendments Effective](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%202/wright.pdf)* Issue 3 ------- Robert H. Lande, *[New Options for State Indirect Purchaser Legislation: Protecting the Real Victims of Antitrust Violations](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/lande.pdf)* Lisa Vertinsky, *[Comparing Alternative Institutional Paths to Patent Reform](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/vertinsky.pdf)* Geoffrey A. Manne, *[Assuming More than We Know About Innovation Markets: A Review of Michael Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/manne.pdf)* Joshua D. Wright and Aubrey N. Stuempfle, *[Patent Holdup, Antitrust, And Innovation: Harness Or Noose?](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/wright.pdf)* Phillip J. Weiser, *[What](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/weiser.pdf)* [Carrier](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/weiser.pdf) *[Doesn’t Address](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/weiser.pdf)* Daniel A. Crane, *[Per Se Illegality for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements?](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/crane.pdf)* Brett M. Frischmann, *[Review of Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/frischmann.pdf)* Dennis Crouch, *[Reviewing Part III of Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/crouch.pdf)* F. Scott Kieff, *[An Inconvenient School of Thought](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/kieff.pdf)* Michael A. Carrier, *[Innovation for the 21st Century: A Response to Seven Critics](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/carrier.pdf)* Tempe Smith, Note, *[Going to Seed?: Using](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/smith.pdf)* [Monsanto](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/smith.pdf) *[as a Case Study to Examine the Patent and Antitrust Implications of the Sale and Use of Genetically Modified Seeds](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/smith.pdf)* Brannan W. Reaves, Note, *[Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Venture Capital Industry: What You Can Do to Protect Yourself](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%203/reaves.pdf)* Issue 4 ------- Carol Pauli, *[Killing the Microphone: When Broadcast Freedom Should Yield to Genocide Prevention](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/pauli.pdf)* Scott R. Bauries, *[Is There an Elephant in the Room?: Judicial Review of Educational Adequacy and the Separation of Powers in State Constitutions](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/bauries.pdf)* Sandra F. Sperino, *[A Modern Theory of Direct Corporate Liability for Title VII](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/sperino.pdf)* Susan Pace Hamill, Essay, *[Ethics Reform in Alabama](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/hamill.pdf)* Matthew H. Kramer, *[Freedom and the Rule of Law](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/kramer.pdf)* Allison L. Collins, Note, *[“I Will Not Pronounce You Husband and Husband”: Justice and the Justice of the Peace](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/collins.pdf)* Kimberly Diane White, Note, *[Covenant Marriage: An Unnecessary Second Attempt at Fault-Based Divorce](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%204/white.pdf)* Issue 5 ------- Daniel J. Meador, *[The Supreme Court Of Alabama-Its Cahaba Beginning, 1820-1825](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/meador.pdf)* David Reiss, *[Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Future of Federal Housing Finance Policy: A Study of Regulatory Privilege](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/reiss.pdf)* Eric S. Knutsen, *[Confusion about Causation in Insurance: Solutions for Catastrophic Losses](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/knutsen.pdf)* Jeffrey M. Hirsch, *[Revolution in Pragmatist Clothing: Nationalizing Workplace Law](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/hirsch.pdf)* Mechele Dickerson, *[Vanishing Financial Freedom](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/dickerson.pdf)* H. Chandler Combest, Note, *[Symbolism as Savior: A Look at the Impact of the IRS Ban on Political Activity by Tax-Exempt Religious Organizations](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/combest.pdf)* James Findley, Note, *[The Debate over Nonlawyer Probate Judges: A Historical Perspective](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/findley.pdf)* Raley L. Wiggins, Note, *[Adeemed If You Do, Adeemed If You Don’t: The Testator’s Intent to Passively Revoke a Specific Devise](https://www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2061/Issue%205/wiggins.pdf)*