---
title: 'Volume 60'
date: '2011-09-12T21:49:49-05:00'
type: page
word_count: 1054
char_count: 8337
tokens: 1371
---

# Volume 60

**ISSUE 1**
-----------

Carissa Byrne Hessick and F. Andrew Hessick, *[Appellate Review of Sentencing Decisions](https://law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%201/Hessick.pdf)*

Robert C. Illig, *[The Promise of Hedge Fund Governance: How Incentive Compensation can Enhance Institutional Investor Monitoring](https://law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%201/Illig.pdf)*

Herbert Hovenkamp, *[Innovation and the Domain of Competition Policy](https://law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%201/Hovenkamp.pdf)*

Scott Dodson, Essay, *[The Challenge of Comparative Civil Procedure](https://law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%201/Dodson.pdf)*

Lindsey C. Boney, IV, Note, *[Forum Shopping Through the Federal Rules of Evidence](https://law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%201/Boney.pdf)*

**ISSUE 2**
-----------

Charles A. Sullivan, *[The Phoenix from the Ash: Proving Discrimination by Comparators](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Sullivan-Phoenix_from_the_Ash.pdf)*

John Blevins, *[A Fragile Foundation – The Role of “Intermodal” and “Facilities-Based” Competition in Communications Policy](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Blevins-A_Fragile_Foundation.pdf)*

John Fee, *[The Pornographic Secondary Effects Doctrine](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Fee-Secondary_Effects.pdf)*

Christopher M. Pietruszkiewicz, *[Economic Substance and the Standard of Review](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Pietruskiewicz-Economic_Substance.pdf)*

Daniel J. Hulsebosch, *[An Empire of Law: Chancellor Kent and the Revolution in Books in the Early Republic](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Hulsebosch-Empire_of_Law.pdf)*

Joseph A. Colquitt, Essay, *[Can Alabama Handle the Truth (in Sentencing)?](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Colquitt-Truth_in_Sentencing.pdf)*

Christopher Diskill, Note, *[A Dangerous Doctrine: The Case Against Using Concerted-Misconduct Estoppel to Compel Arbitration](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Driskill-Concerted_Misconduct.pdf)*

Adam K. Israel, Note, *[To Scrub or Not to Scrub: The Ethical Implications of Metadata and Electronic Data Creation, Exchange, and Discovery](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Israel-Metadata.pdf)*

Elizabeth Murphy, Note, *[The Current State of Caveat Emptor in Alabama Real Estate Sales](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Murphy-Caveat_Emptor.pdf)*

Timothy Dylan Reeves, Note, *[Tort Liability for Manufacturers of Violent Video Games: A Situational Discussion of the Causation Calamity](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%202/Reeves-Violent_Video_Games.pdf)*

**ISSUE 3**
-----------

Samuel P. Jordan, *[Irregular Panels](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/jordan.pdf)*

Marc O. DeGirolami, *[Culpability in Creating the Choice of Evils](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/degirolami.pdf)*

Douglas G. Smith, *[A Federalism-Based Rationale for Limited Liability](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/smith.pdf)*

Carol Rice Andrews, Essay, *[Thinking About Civil Discovery in Alabama: Using the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a Thinking Tool](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/andrews.pdf)*

Brian L. Church, Note, *[Balancing Corrective Justice and Deterrence: Injury Requirements and the Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/church.pdf)*

John P. Norman, Note, *[“Self-Preservation is the Supreme Law”: State Rights vs. Military Necessity in Alabama Civil War Conscription Cases](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/norman.pdf)*

M. Tae Phillips, Note, *[Un-Equal Protection: Preferential Admissions Treatment for Student Athletes](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%203/phillips.pdf)*

**ISSUE 4**
-----------

Mark S. Scarberry, *[Historical Considerations and Congressional Representation for the District of Columbia: Constitutionality of the D.C. House Voting Rights Bill in Light of Section Two of the Fourteenth Amendment and the History of the Creation of the District](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/scarberry.pdf)*

F. Andrew Hessick, III, *[The Common Law of Federal Question Jurisdiction](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/hessick.pdf)*

José E. Alvarez, *[Contemporary Foreign Investment Law: An “Empire of Law” or the “Law of Empire”?](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/alvarez.pdf)*

Susan Randall, Essay, *[Only in Alabama: A Modest Tort Agenda](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/randall.pdf)*

Cameron W. Ellis, Note, *[Church Factionalism and Judicial Resolution: A Reconsideration of the Neutral-Principles Approach](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/ellis.pdf)*

Joel Everest, Note, *[Fibromyalgia and Workers’ Compensation: Controversy, Problems, and Injustice](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/everest.pdf)*

David M. Powers, Note, *[The Political Intersection of School Choice, Race, and Values](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%204/powers.pdf)*

**ISSUE 5**
-----------

Miriam A. Cherry, *[Working For (Virtually) Minimum Wage: Applying the Fair Labor Standards Act In Cyberspace](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/cherry.pdf)*

Bryan K. Fair, *[Intersectionality Theory, the Anticaste Principle, and the Future of Brown](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/fair.pdf)*

Alda Facio and Martha I. Morgan, *[Equity or Equality for Women? Understanding CEDAW’s Equality Principles](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/faciot.pdf)*

Blanca Rodriguez-Ruiz and Ruth Rubio-Marin, *[Constitutional Justification of Parity Democracy](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/rodriguez.pdf)*

Rodrigo Jiménez, *[Gender in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/jimenez.pdf)*

Michael S. Pardo, *[Introduction to the Meador Series 2007-2008: Empire](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/pardo.pdf)*

Michele Goodwin, *[Empires of the Flesh: Tissue and Organ Taboos](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/goodwin.pdf)*

Edgar C. Gentle, III, Essay, *[Administration of the 2003 Tolbert PCB Settlement in Anniston, Alabama: An Attempted Collaborative and Holistic Remedy](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/gentle.pdf)*

Timothy A. Heisterhagen, Note, *[Revisionism and Inconsistency in the Alabama Supreme Court: The Law Surrounding Recovery for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/heisterhagen.pdf)*

Scott L. Tindle, Note, *[Could Modern Faith-Based Prison Programs Have Survived Constitutional Scrutiny During Reconstruction?](//www.law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/archive/law-review-articles/Volume%2060/Issue%205/tindle.pdf)*
